Thursday, April 4, 2013

On biases, prejudice and commitment

Civil Service in India looks for glorified amateurs, jack of all trades but masters of none, generalists and paper pushers and the list of the usual diatribes go on. Without any skills in a specific field, they decide on matters related to banking, defence, culture, environment and energy is the usual argument of specialists who want to make decisions in these fields but are allegedly kept away by the apples of the government's eye.
I have seen specialists (doctors, lawyers, accountants and auditors) vehemently defend their position based on narrow interpretation and interests generated by their profession. It is not a fault or deficiency, but an essential pre-requisite in their professions.
Citing anecdotes is not a scientific way, but I do give them to explain what I am talking about. A doctor friend of mine, who otherwise is quite liberal and forward-thinking, is sensible and took up the profession as a service argued that introducing a course like Bachelor of Rural Medicine would dilute quality, drive real doctors out of their jobs and lead to poor health outcomes for rural population. It is unfortunate that someone I respect a lot and hold in high regards had to fall prey to a narrow view based on her profession. She expressed her views during the strike organised by medical students across Kerala in 2010 against the idea of a BRM course.
Doctors do not want to be posted in deep, unreachable villages where pay is low and living facilities are not adequate. Distance is also a factor when it comes to doctors with families and many have a post-graduate degree. It is primary and secondary care that villagers need urgently, basic health interventions and first-aid- not super speciality care and so appointing post-graduate doctors is not the need of the population and the doctors would also find their skills unused making them look for better opportunities. The only reason many take up such posts is because it is a government job and the inherent job safety. 
 
But the majority of doctors do not turn up at their health centres and have a flourishing private practice. This is true not just of doctors in rural areas but those from medical colleges and hospitals in city too follow this method. In the interior heartlands of the red-belt or Left Wing Extremism affected districts the situation is dire. Absence rate of doctors is more than 50% (validated by several surveys), doctor-patient ratio is 1:25,870 on average in India and they are concentrated in the urban areas. To enforce attendance, a monitoring mechanism by empowering local bodies, who would also pay the salaries for doctors, is being considered. I hope this works, but I am not so sure because I do not think local bodies can pay the doctors enough to attract them to stay in a place with very little amenities and also face the threat of violence.
 
In spite of lack of doctors, high absence rate among existing doctors that amounts to dereliction of duty and low interest in a rural posting, the current medical fraternity are blocking an urgently needed reform in healthcare by providing for a course that directly addresses the healthcare needs of rural population. Their only solution is for the state to appoint more doctors- the fact that doctors are not interested in these postings and are not attending to their duties are not heeded to.

An auditor who alleged corruption and scope of environmental damage in a government scheme that replaced incandescent bulbs with CFL lamps due to their high mercury contend also argues that crores have been invested in a mega hydro-electric power project and it has been delayed due to denial of environment clearance. The concern is not about environment, but merely about audit as an end to itself.
When it comes to holistic decision making- a case where the social, environmental and economic impact is to be considered (I do not include political factors since that is the job of the political executive) someone who is not restricted by a narrow view must make that decision and that can be done by generalists who do not owe allegiance to any specific field.

PS- When I mean decision making, I mean advising the political executive on the course of action on a particular issue since the final decisions and policies are made by them.

No comments: